The way in which Swift presents his idea makes it seem like cannibalism is a real possibility. He statements are so matter of fact, and his ideas and reasoning make cannibalism seem not so different from us raising cows to eat later on. In my opinion though, the fact of the matter is that humans have no reason to prey on each other. The reason we are having a shortage of food is because there are so many of us, and families in poorer third world countries, who cannot afford food as it is, are having the most children. This makes feeding them near impossible. So, while logically Swift’s ideas make sense, I don’t agree with its morals. As humans, we are smart enough to exercise population control. We don’t have the animal instinct to reproduce so our species doesn’t go extinct. We know that everybody doesnt need to have three or more children a pieve to keep the human race alive. We can impose certain regulations on how many children are allowed in each family, as China does. I also think that I, or anybody I know for that matter, could get over the “abhorrence” of raising a child for food. If children suddenly had a per pound dollar value put on them, women would be getting paid to have as many children as they could. Women would suddenly have one main purpose, to have children. Children would be cooped up and fed, and probably even be given growth hormones to make them big, just like the cows, chickens, and other animals we harvest now. Most of us can agree that what we do to other animals is bad enough, and that inflicting these moral wrong doings on ourselves would be even worse.
Calabro, Marian. The Perilous Journey of the Donner Party. New York: Clarion Books, 1999.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I agree with you I think that if this cannibalism happened children will start to be treated like animals and be given hormones etc. and mothers will start having lots of babies just to get money and giving birth will become one of their main occupations
That's an interesting point to possibly equating babies as any other food source. By this method, it substantially can only provide so much. Just think if this was applied but with "better care" whether by the means of just "plumping" them up before a much needed meal or by use of growth hormones, it seems even more bizzare that the situation already is; overpopulation wouldn't be so bad after all.
Post a Comment